The outspoken, lifelong liberal comedian Bill Maher recently declared his vote "In Play." Has the Democratic Party lost another stalwart?

 

(Photo: Thomas Hawk)

 

Bill Maher has spent more than three decades doing something television, and other left-leaning institutions, increasingly discourages: arguing with people who disagree with him.

That helps explain why his recent declaration that his 2028 vote is “in play” landed with more force than the usual celebrity political complaint. Maher is not a conservative convert. He remains pro-choice, secular, environmentally minded and deeply suspicious of Donald Trump’s refusal to accept electoral defeat. He also said he wants Democrats to win the 2026 midterms.

But when ABC’s Jonathan Karl asked whether he could vote for Vice President JD Vance in 2028, Maher answered yes—if the Democratic nominee represented the socialist, anti-police and anti-Israel direction he increasingly associates with the party’s activist wing. He said he would not live in “communist America” and added that when people on the left are “cheering for the intifada,” he is out. Maher also complained that Republicans routinely appear on his program and accept hostile questioning while many Democrats decline invitations, even though Democrats have traditionally received his vote.

That is not yet a breakup. It is a warning.

Still, Democrats have heard warnings like this before.

Elon Musk once described himself as someone who had generally voted Democratic. In 2022, he announced that he could no longer support the party, accusing it of becoming consumed by “division and hate.” Two years later, he endorsed Trump and became one of the Republican candidate’s most prominent and financially consequential allies.

Joe Rogan followed a different route. Rogan supported Bernie Sanders in the 2020 Democratic primary and built a following among politically unclassifiable listeners: younger men, libertarians, anti-establishment liberals and people suspicious of both parties. During the pandemic, however, his conflicts with progressive institutions, public-health authorities and media organizations deepened. In November 2024, after hosting Trump for a nearly three-hour interview, Rogan formally endorsed him.

Musk, Rogan and Maher are very different figures, and treating them as interchangeable would be a mistake. Musk became an active Republican power broker. Rogan remains ideologically fluid but crossed the line from entertaining Trump to endorsing him. Maher has crossed neither line.

What connects them is a shared sense that the modern Democratic coalition has become less tolerant of dissent—particularly on speech, COVID policy, policing, gender, capitalism and Israel. Their departures or threatened departures also expose a cultural problem. Democrats once benefited from being the natural political home of comedians, technologists, artists, skeptics and social outsiders. Now some prominent members of those groups describe the party itself as rigid, scolding and institutionally defensive.

There is a counterargument. Musk and Rogan did not merely get pushed away; they also moved right, developed new audiences and formed relationships with Republican figures. Maher’s description of the Democratic Party can similarly exaggerate the influence of its most radical activists. Most elected Democrats are not calling for the abolition of police, prisons or private industry.

Yet political parties are judged partly by the voices they elevate and the ideas they appear afraid to challenge. Maher’s complaint is that Democratic leaders too often whisper their disagreements with the left while publicly accommodating it.

Has the party lost Bill Maher? Not yet. He still wants Democrats to check Trump in the midterms, and Republicans’ election denial remains a major obstacle for him. But the Democratic Party has lost something it once possessed: the certainty that a lifelong liberal like Maher would always consider the Republican alternative unthinkable.

His vote is not Republican. But it is available. For Democrats, that should be alarming enough.

(Contributing writer, Brooke Bell)